Monthly Archives: January 2010

A better way for Twin Lakes

by Bob McKenzie, Twin Lakes Country Club associate member

Jan 28 2010, 8:15 PM Federal Way Mirror

There’s much ado within the Twin Lakes community about how one member of the Twin Lakes Homeowners Association Board unilaterally met with the Twin Lakes Golf and Country Club Board and set up a joint meeting of both, and within a few months presented a decision to the community in a couple of town meetings as fait accompli.

This joint meeting, which thus far appears to have no official record, is now seen as a clandestine meeting between them to strategically position themselves to prosecute a rescue mission and financial juggernaut to force an increased assessment, or tax as some have called it, for the next 15 years or more on the 1,000 or so homeowners who are not members. This sector of the community has thus become the low-hanging fruit of this newly-formed august body, which had always stood firm on their separate and impenetrable autonomy.

It also is unfortunate for the entire community in that unlike Northshore in its cohesive community battle against, and recent overwhelming victory over the developers; this ill-conceived and impetuous action on the part of the Twin Lakes Homeowners Association has created a division within this community that has now evolved into a battle of neighbor against neighbor.

We have lived along the golf course for nearly 30 years. Our opposition is not about the $25 assessment. It’s about how this process was mishandled. If it made sense we would gladly pay an additional $25 over and above the $60-plus that we currently pay. Instead, we were offered a “$25 rebate,” which would be applied to the “amenities agreement.” To me that’s a kickback that amounts to a phantom transaction, which strategically positions it to become an immediate lien on a homeowner’s property, not to mention the appearance of disparate treatment to those who do not live on the golf course. While I’m not questioning the integrity of any particular member of the board in this or any other instance, what I am questioning is the judgment, if not the motive of the entire board.

In the January 2010 Twin Lakes Golf and Country Club newsletter, the president, Jimme Schneider affirmed the country club’s commitment to the homeowners’ board as they “work toward a successful vote.” He also revealed the current ability of the club to solve its own financial problems when he categorically stated that “the TLGCC has many other options that can be implemented to insure the survival of Twin lakes…the Amenities Program is the one that will provide the most financial stability.” He continues: “Actually, the passage of the amenities package may well allow for an expansion of services, such as a fitness room, pool improvements and club house enhancements…” And finally, he says, “I want to reiterate that while the trustees strongly support the amenities program, we are at the same time continuing to pursue every other viable alternative.”

This is an incredible revelation. Here the president of the country club informs us that the club has “many other options” to pursue while the president of the homeowners association informs us that the homeowners have no other options but to buy into this ill-conceived rescue package. The president of the golf course letter in the Sandblaster supports the personal letter he sent to all members in August 2009 informing us of the financial state of the club and that he would effectively “revert back to a management structure formerly used successfully for many years.”

The problem: Before we had an opportunity to hear about any of the other options, or plans, the homeowners association had offered the homeowners as living sacrifice on the altar of financial stability of the country club. Meanwhile, the 187 proprietary members, about 50 of whom live in Twin Lakes, are sitting on their collective “many other options” and vigorously assisting the homeowners association in their efforts to deliver them a 15-year-to-life care package.

We can do better than this. Twin Lakes homeowners do not exist in a pool of ignorance. There is an abundance of talent in this community. Therefore, we should deliver a resounding defeat to this measure and then set about the business of doing the right thing, whatever it may be, in a cohesive and organized forum. Where is the common sense in asking the homeowners to bail out a private, non-profit business? There is a better way.

A better way for Twin Lakes Federal Way letters – Federal Way Mirror.

Well, we are almost out of time!

by Ted Straub

It is the 11th hour and if we as homeowners don’t stand to be counted, the only thing left to do is for TLGCC to sit back count our money and go back to “business as usual”. They have a whole two years to dream up ways to spend the next raise in your TLHOA dues.

Why don’t they have a new irrigation system installed (the existing one is 35 years old and inadequate)? That will only cost in excess of 2 million dollars. Oh, and they can begin to pay off the 1.3 million dollar remodel of the clubhouse the already owe. How about the purchase of some new equipment for the greens crew or restore the wages of employees they (in their wisdom) cut by 10% (the only actions they took besides firing a manager who acted under their direction).

What a business plan! This couldn’t have gone smoother if orchestrated by a US Senator. You’d expect this from the government, but pork barrel politics on the part of a HOA, “pure genius” and future possibilities are endless!

The golfing members (187 OWNERS) of TLGCC don’t care about whether you as an amenities agreement participant (Homeowner) can enjoy the dining facilities. They don’t care if you or your children can’t swim in the already overcrowded pool 4 months out of the year. They don’t care if you can’t get on the one tennis court available. Most of them don’t even live here and care less about overcrowding the club or the community at large. What they do care about is whether or not you will fund their golfing privileges and preserve their Country Club Status at no cost to them! The proof is in the restrictions placed in the agreement concerning the amenities golf privileges.

This agreement negotiated by the Board of TLHOA (on behalf of the local real-estate agents) is a scam to bilk millions of dollars from TLHOA homeowners over the next 15 years and compounded by the fact that the (OWNERS) golfing members of TLGCC won’t even invest in themselves by raising their own dues to help cover short-falls in their budget. Why should they? They can send the TLHOA board after your hard earned money.

TLGCC has less than a stellar track record as a business over the last 35 years, and is questionable at best in their business practices. They have presented themselves to the TLHOA members as having a $5000.00 value in their memberships alone. The only true value they have is the facility and grounds, which they are threatening the sale of to leverage us as homeowners. Does the word Extortion come to mind? The truth is that their memberships are impossible to market, as they have no value since (in the past) they allowed some members to resign their memberships for the payment of one month’s dues. No one in their right mind would enter into a business arrangement under any circumstances with TLGCC and the thought of such a deal is beyond comprehension.

The bluff they have perpetrated on the TLHOA members is unconscionable. This compounded with the threat of selling with the perceived outcome presented by the TLHOA board of “gloom and doom” is despicable at the least. The phrase “ethically challenged” on the part of both boards (TLGCC and TLHOA) comes to mind.

TLGCC’s refusal to take the course public has forced them to take this grievous action against the TLHOA members. The Board of TLHOA has not only gone along with this plan but has championed it. All the while as governing bodies of our community, they sit back and let apathy and fear on our part as homeowners take its effect. Proof of their (TLGCC’s) audacity, they had to change their own by-laws to rebate dues to homeowners who live on the fairways. This is an obvious attempt to buy enough votes to insure the amendment to fund them would pass. SLICK HUH! All this negotiated by a single board member of the TLHOA behind our backs. It’s no wonder they won’t accept any changes or suggestions from the homeowners. Makes you wonder what else he promised TLGCC, besides delivering this vote in their favor.

It also explains why the TLHOA board called “town meetings” instead of special called meetings, simple; you can’t conduct business or make changes unless it’s a special called meeting with a quorum present. We as homeowners were not given the opportunity to change anything about this contract; it was set in stone before we even heard about it.  If so then why wasn’t the contract document produced for the members to review as requested, until the second vote was called?

The letter from a board members wife distributed by the TLHOA was very insightful but was written to make us feel as though we as homeowners are not capable of seeing or missed the “big picture”. Insulting as it was, it’s self serving motives will do little to garner support and stating their gratitude for the opportunity to serve TLGCC’s agenda is offensive. Do the Boards of TLGCC and TLHOA really feel that we are incapable of independent thought?

The idea of creating a proxy for every action voted on, used only by the board of TLHOA is ludicrous. You’re not even given the chance to vote on the proxy (YES or NO), you simply give your proxy to the TLHOA Board for them to vote as they see fit. WRONG! If this is the practice then the proxies should be split to follow the percentages voted as the whole quorum voted at the meeting. In essence the proxy system used by the TLHOA stinks and is used by the TLHOA Board to control the vote. The real villains in this whole mess are the local real-estate agents; they have perpetrated an unpardonable injustice to us by manipulation and deceit. They are responsible for the contract between TLGCC and TLHOA. This is evidenced by their own admissions, positions on the board, letters written to other real-estate agencies and letters written by them and distributed on their behalf.

On Saturday, February 6 get out to Decatur and vote NO. Your vote is needed!

10 Reasons to vote NO on February 6th!

by Bob McKenzie, Mike McLeod and Mari Francissen

To read the Twin Lakes proposed Amenities Agreement CLICK HERE

  1. THE FEES ARE NOT ASSESSED EQUALLY: Our Board has tried to gloss over the fact that golfing members and owners who live on the golf course do not have their dues increased. These owners pay, but receive and equal rebate from the golf course as described in the November issue of the Twin Lakes Courier. The majority of owners do not live on the golf course and are not members. So the people that benefit most from the survival of the course do not get an increase in fees.
  2. RAPIDLY INCREASING FEES: As proposed, the fees are $25 per month or $300 per year for the first two years. Then they can increase up to 5% per year thereafter. If these dues increase 5% per year, you will be paying $566 per year in the 15th year and will have paid $6180 during this 15 year period. This is on top of the standard HOA fees, which have never increased at this rate.
  3. SCARE TACTICS ARE BEING USED TO PUSH THE AGREEMENT: Our HOA Board has repeated suggested that the golf course land will be developed with houses and condos if we do not bail out the golf course. The proposed development of 800+ houses at Northshore Golf Course has been cited as the example of things to come at Twin Lakes. However, the Northshore redevelopment plan was denied by the Hearing Examiner. One of the reasons for this denial was an agreement made prior to the golf course being developed that the golf course would serve and remain as open space for the Northshore neighborhood. (News Tribune 1/19/10) The 1978 Washington State Supreme Court case of Twin Lakes Golf & Country Club versus King County said the golf course land must remain open space, free of buildings, etc. The Twin Lakes HOA has tried to minimize and/or ignore this Supreme Court case, despite its importance.
  4. THE TWIN LAKES HOA BOARD DID NOT ASK FOR HOMEOWNER INPUT: This is the most important and far reaching issue in the existence of Twin Lakes. Yet the HOA Board asked for no input. The town-hall-style meetings held after the ballot was mailed were a pure sales pitch. This agreement was negotiated behind closed doors by our HOA and TLGCC long before it was presented to us as homeowners. In fact, the first time most people ever heard of it was when they got the ballot in the mail. There was more public input on the issue of truck racks than on this agreement!
  5. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THIS WILL SAVE THE GOLF COURSE: Nor is there any expectation under this agreement that this bailout attempt will keep the golf course afloat. The TLGCC “business plan” is rudimentary and does not address the issues that got them into this mess to begin with. In fact, the new business plan is the exact same plan that the TLGCC claims they have been implementing for the last three years.
  6. HOMEOWNER UNDERREPRESENTATION & NO ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE HOMEOWNERS: Our HOA only gets one member position on a board of nine at the golf club. the effect of this is that our HOA has virtually no power to influence ANY decision made by the privately owned TLGCC. Worse than that, once the agreement is approved our  HOA and TLGCC boards can modify the agreement as they see fit.
  7. POOR OPT-OUT OPTIONS: There are opt-out options in the agreement but they are completely in the hands of the HOA Board. NO HOMEOWNER INPUT OR VOTE IS REQUIRED. Judging by how our Board has been lobbied by the TLGCC and has railroaded this issue, voluntary opting out is unlikely.
  8. WEAK AMENITIES PACKAGE: The TLGCC is claiming that they MUST have our help to survive and that we are their only savior; yet the amenities provided in the agreement are poor. In return for bailing out this private club, 1350 households will be allowed to share the use of one tennis court and one small swimming pool on a busy street. And how many rounds of golf do you get to play for $300 per year (increasing after the 2nd year)? NONE. Your increase in dues only gives you the opportunity to golf, with priority given to real golf club members! To actually play golf, you also have to pay green fees each time you play. The TLGCC does not want a lot of additional golfers,; they just want your money!
  9. YOU ARE BEING FORCED TO BAIL OUT A PRIVATE ORGANIZATION: TLGCC is an independent private business and our HOA has no stake in its ownership and operation. In spite of this your property will be subject to a lien for failure to subsidize someone else’s failing business.
  10. THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS: At no time in the last few months has our HOA Board pursued or even suggested other reponses to the TLGCC’s financial crisis, nor has our HOA Board sought input from homeowners. $6 million in dues over 15 years is more than it would cost our HOA to purchase and own the golf course outright!

You cannot afford to sit this vote out! Just 250 votes could force the rest of us to pay these fees. Please join us to protect our rights as a Twin Lakes homeowner by VOTING NO on February 6th.

Talk to your neighbors. Enlist their support.

Call us if you’d like help in other ways. If you agree with us but can’t be at the vote, submit your proxy to us as we will VOTE NO for you!

YOUR PROXY IN THE HANDS OF THE BOARD IS A “YES” VOTE!(Another fact the Board has glossed over in their propaganda.) Contact us either by mail or phone to pick up your proxy by February 2nd so that your voice will be heard.

IF YOU HAVE ALREADY SUBMITTED YOUR PROXY TO THE HOA, PLEASE CONTACT US AND WE WILL ASSIST YOU IN REGISTERING IT AS A “NO” VOTE.

EMAIL US: homeowners4twinlakes@gmail.com

CALL:

Bob McKenzie – 253-288-9004

Mike McLeod – 253-369-7366

Mari Francissan – 253-332-8334

MAIL:

P.O. Box 25241

Federal Way WA 98093-2241